Minkowski space?
It is very prime!
Or
" the THEORY of SPACES "
PART - 1 (in fragments)
1. WHAT SUCH HABITUAL And UNUSUAL?
Whether you can imagine flight by the plane, if you never flied? And whether you can
imagine a jump with a parachute, if you never springed? Or to imagine sensation of a zero
gravity, if you е ё never tested? Probably, is not present, or your representation of
sensations will be not such. Recollect the vital experience. All, what you make for the
first time, you not so-so represented it?
The same flight by the plane. Sowing in him(it) for the first time, view of the Earth from
height, you, probably, not so-so represented? All our vital experience develops of
memorization of sensations in the different phenomena. The subjects downwards impinge,
means, we think, and should be. The chance impression is created, that differently and be
can not, as though can not a body be kept in air, and it should necessary to fall
downwards.
These sensations we learn from the birth, from the antiquity.
And if was differently? If the man and all on a planet would live in requirements of a
zero gravity? And if you to them have got, could you explain to them that, if their planet
rotated more slowly, they could come nearer to ground without any cords, and what she(it)
would draw them? They, probably, would lift you on laughter. Such be can not, they would
tell, how the ground can draw, through air, whether what? That is all representations
about the World at us especially "objective", and objekt-lens can be any.
Would be objekt-lens at our eye more long-focus, we 6ы вс ё saw as in the
binoculars. The far objects would seem by close, the distances between objects would seem
short, and вс ё the space would seem oblate. And on the contrary, at short-focus
objekt-lens of an eye, the space would seem stretched(dragged out), the distances
between objects - major, close subjects - are strongly garbled, the prolate natural hand
would seem is longer (look in the binoculars on the contrary). I want by it to tell that
вс ё in a nature rather, and it is impossible the habitual sensations to accept for
" a pure(clean) coin ". It is necessary to be able to look in a root: why it so,
instead of differently, and whence I look. Not always it is possible to trust to
sensations, and not primely to trust, and to penetrate into essence of the phenomenon.
The people very much frequently do not trouble themselves to reflect even above the prime
phenomena, and are blindly figured on feeling.
For example:
1. As it is easier to be floating: on fluxion(current), against or across?
2. In what case приплывёшь to a coast is faster: плывя to a
coast on fluxion(current) and under a small corner, or to be floating
under a right angle to a coast?
The exact answers:
1. It is identical.
2. Under direct.
I think that the comments here are not necessary, but it is possible and to comment. In a
propellented train, how it is easier to you to go on the car, on a course of a train or
against? And in a compartment you come unless under a skew angle?
2. IS MORE DETAILED 0 MOTION.
If you are in a propellented train, whether you feel the motion? I have no in view of
rocking and drifts from the leg(party) in the leg(party). You can quietly play in tennis,
or ещ ё in everything, and any differences from game on the Earth will not be. Them and
be can not, as you are in a state such, rest, as well as on the Earth. Can too most
do(make) both in the plane, and it does not depend on velocity, with what she(it) would
not be. The quiescence to you is supplied, if only the drive on you did not press. On the
Earth and in air the rate of flux of energy of the drive leaves on ensuring(supplying) to
you a quiescence, instead of that вс ё time to jolt you. If in space to push a subject,
it(he) will fly indefinitely long and never will stop. Then, to stop it(him), it is
necessary to spend equally as much energies, how many was spent on his(its) dispersal. To
give it(him) energy or to take е ё is one and too. To stop or to disperse - and this one
and too, and вс ё it rather. The free flight is too quiescence. If we speak - to stop
any body, concerning what? This body is in the same equal in rights system, in what and
you. From his(its) point of view, it will be - dispersal, i.e. change of velocity. Also
there is no such колышка or armature in hollow, which would measure your velocity.
Where you, there and your armature (quiescence), and velocity - concept relative.
3. And IF the VELOCITY WILL BE MAJOR,
"ОКОЛОСВЕТОВАЯ"?
And than the major velocity from small differs? Running beforehand, I shall answer at
once: by anything, all is absolutely identical. And how, you ask, to be with a constancy
of velocity of light?
Now and further we shall view it on examples. Оговорим of a requirement: for
simplicity of calculations and perception(recognition) возьмём velocity of light
With = 300т. km / with (equal)(($equally)), distance between the Earth and Moon - 300т.
km. Two ships, distance between which too 300 т. Km., beforehand were dispersed and have
switched off drives, their velocity - *** т. Km / with. They will fly by by the Earth and
Moon on underload distance on direct АБ.
Apart *** т. Km. From the Earth we shall hang up буй (Fig. 1).
....................
Further there are visual examples with figures, different points of view on events: the
observers from Ground space and космонавтов from two rockets, build-up of a
logic chain, deductions of the formulas.
...............
The velocity "bends" space, as well as a lens or gravitation. Actually she(it)
bends (velocity) in general nothing, it is a view of one three-dimensional space from
other three-dimensional in a Minkowski space.
Tell: why вс ё on the Earth should be squeezed, if past someone flys by? And in a
rocket космонавт will tell too most - why I should be squeezed, if the Earth with
the Moon fly by by me? It(he) is in the same equal in rights space, it same
"wide", it(he) is in a quiescence, it(he) there lives. At him(it) the time goes
just as and at us, at him(it) same Евклидова geometry and same Newton's laws,
same laws of physics and chemistry.
It is not reasonable to put a ruler to propellented object, and on what extremity(end) of
a ruler to look earlier, and on what later? You see to nobody comes in a head to put a
ruler to glass of a window of the plane, measuring ground objects and distances between
them. Or to put a ruler to a lens, through which we look.
How, for example, two are intercrossed direct? In a point Е (Fig. 4). Means
one-dimensional spaces in bidimensional, are intercrossed by a point.
How two planes are intercrossed? On a line АВ (Fig. 5). Means bidimensional spaces in
three-dimensional, are intercrossed by a line.
Fig. 4 One-dimensional spaces.
A Fig. 5 Bidimensional spaces.
Means, prolonging this analogy, three-dimensional spaces in четырёхмерном,
will be intercrossed by a plane. This plane transits through objects which are flying by
each other, and settles down perpendicularly to direction of their cross motion. It is the
unique(sole) moment, when concept of a simultaneity of events on objects coincide, and
further again miss.
Imagine эдакие "scissors" of a simultaneity, they are doubled, and at
rapproachement of objects they converge, is accelerated движутся from their past
in their future (crossly). At passage each other, the objects will appear in a plane of
cross of spaces, "scissors" of a simultaneity on an instant will be left, it
will be "hereby" (moment of time) for both systems, but it will be only zero
instant. Further at a discrepancy of objects, "scissors" of a simultaneity miss
in other leg(party), they as though "are impeded" в "present" each
other crossly. By such о6аразом the time is transmuted into distance, and to verify
clocks it is possible only in one point of one space. In more detail about it, we shall
consider on examples, further.
I output a playful postulate: time it not "THAT",
and Time it "WHERE".
.........................
What such velocity? It is kilometers per one second. But whose kilometers, and per whose
second? Where stake in hollow, concerning which I could measure the velocity?
It stake is the electromagnetic interaction between all three-dimensional spaces in
четырёхмерном. The velocity of this interaction is fluxion(current) of time
at all spaces. For light this velocity -? Km / 0 сек., and dispersal instantaneous -?
Km / 0 сек2, м reflection from a mirror same instantaneous for 0 сек. And flight
back with the same velocity. The light wave is anything, it " the extremity(end) of
light ", extremity(end) of any space, it there where the time costs(stands), mass is
not present, the space misses. It began a zero of readout, time for all three-dimensional
spaces. Any slightest backlog from a light wave - will not be slightest, and will cost to
you - 300т. Your kilometers, per your second, your space.
Mass is too concept existing in time. Word "exists" - speaks that the time for
not ё goes. The time costs(stands) on a place, means also masses is not present, but
there is an energy, which runs with velocity With, for all spaces. The wave has stopped,
having stumbled about mass, this energy will turn in mass. And on the contrary, mass,
having turned in energy, becomes a traveling wave, mass is not present. While flies, mass
is not present, and the time for not ё costs(stands).
............
If in a propellented train the two play in tennis, as. On yours, it is better to explore a
trajectory of a motion of a blob? From a platform? It вс ё is equal, that a pattern on
the computer to draw in machine codes. Whether easier to sit in a train and evidently to
see his(its) motions concerning trains, not paying attention on a propellented platform.
Also it is bad to study the phenomena on major velocities, that is from other space.
Whether easier to unfold space with the help of this coefficient, that is to reach
his(its) normal sizes, to normal time, промоделировать something, and then
again to curtail(turn) it(him) with the help of same coefficient and to look, how it will
look from our space. Or ещ ё an example (Fig. 6)
Fig. 6 Projections three-dimensional in bidimensional.
All of us understand, that this three-dimensional image бруска, in bidimensional
плоскоскости. Also that the legs(party) АБ and ВГ - are parallel, and the
legs(party) ВЕ and ГЖ - are equal. And nobody speaks, that the geometry varies at
transition from one plane in another, and becomes not Евклидовой. As well the
three-dimensional spaces can settle down under different "corners" to each other
in the fourth measuring - time. Imagine, that плоскатики, living in different
planes, which are located under a corner among themselves, they look against each other
through the third measuring, about which not догадыва-ются (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7 Projections one bidimensional in another bidimensional.
Each of them will think, that at them there geometry not Евклидова, the sizes all
are reduced. And physics at them not such, not Newtonian, because all phenomena they will
see in a garbled view.
How many such planes can exist in three-dimensional space? You will tell infinite set, and
will be right.
But if the space четырехмерно, hence, prolonging this analogy, and
three-dimensional spaces can be infinite set - in четырёхмерном(4x-spaces).
Also it is not necessary to assimilate плоскатику, speaking that there вс ё
oblate.
..............
The three-dimensional spaces in четырёхмерном, can settle down under the
attitude(relation) to each other, under different "corners", therefore and the
identical laws look squeezed, and in each space. The estimate(estimation) of one space, at
a sight on him(it) from other space, will be relative. Also it is not necessary to
assimilate плоскатику, which estimates all World only from the plane, measures
вс ё on аршин, and considers(counts) that only in his(its) plane the laws
"exact".
All spaces - ARE EQUAL IN RIGHTS!
The theory is within the framework of one theory of relativity - CLASSICAL!
The theory of relativity cannot be divided on blanket and
private(individual) - SHE(IT) IS UNIFORM!
The nature IS SYMMETRICAL, HARMONY And
IS BEAUTIFUL! Also there can not be such, that in one её a place the laws one, in
the friend others.
...............
One space "is packed" in the friend, all spaces - are equal in rights, in each
space the identical laws. 300 т.км. Any space is adequate to one second of the same
space. The space in space is it is necessary to learn itself to represent, and the view of
one space from another, will be garbled.
To imagine it it is rather prime.
For this purpose it is necessary:
To turn out the brains inside out, to shake out from them all primitive concepts, to
loaded by their new, and to turn back.
If it is impossible to you, and it is not necessary, strongly do not try also fourth
chapter do not read, differently you will have conflict to a head.
Forgive for poor
translation, the program - " PROMT 98 " translated.
Любарь Владимир Яковлевич
May, 2000 of. Tiraspol
